- +212 611-650826
- contat@r-berroho.com
- 9704 Ziegler Ave Las Vegas , NV 89148. USA
1. Introduction
Transfer pricing (TP) policies are critical to preventing profit shifting, ensuring fair allocation of taxing rights, and stimulating international trade. For developing economies like Morocco and its African peers, TP compliance safeguards domestic revenues while fostering investor confidence. However, the application of TP principles faces significant challenges, including valuation complexities, lack of comparables, and disputes over profit allocation. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of TP policies in line with international standards, focusing on their role in preventing double taxation and stimulating trade. Special emphasis is placed on Morocco’s alignment with OECD[1] and UN principles, as well as practical solutions for overcoming local challenges.
2. Legal Framework of Transfer Pricing
International Principles
The OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines and the UN Model Convention establish the arm’s length principle as the global standard for intercompany transactions. Both frameworks aim to prevent profit shifting by ensuring that related-party transactions mirror those of unrelated parties. Thus, The OECD states that “The arm’s length principle is the cornerstone of transfer pricing, ensuring that profits are taxed where economic activities and value creation occur.”[2]
Moroccan Regulations
Morocco introduced TP-specific provisions in Article 214 of the General Tax Code (CGI) in 2021.[3] These regulations mandate MNEs to document their intercompany transactions and justify compliance with the arm’s length principle.
Morocco’s TP framework reflects its commitment to aligning with international standards while addressing local economic realities.
Alignment with BEPS
Morocco’s participation in the OECD BEPS framework since 2019 highlights its commitment to curbing base erosion and profit shifting through robust TP policies. In this regard the BEPS Action Plans ensure that profits are taxed where substantial economic activities occur, reducing opportunities for tax avoidance.[4]
3. Preventing Double Taxation Through TP Policies
Double Taxation Risks
Intercompany transactions often result in disputes over taxing rights, leading to double taxation. This occurs when two jurisdictions tax the same income due to differences in TP interpretations.
Proposed Solutions:
Both MAPs and APAs could provide certainty and reduce the likelihood of prolonged disputes over intercompany pricing.[5]
African Context
African nations face unique challenges in preventing double taxation, including resource constraints and limited capacity for treaty negotiation and enforcement.
Proposed Solution:
4. Case Studies: Moroccan and International Contexts
Moroccan Case Study:
In a case involving a multinational pharmaceutical company, the Administrative Court of Rabat upheld adjustments to intercompany royalty payments due to insufficient documentation. The court emphasized the need for robust functional analyses and comparables.[7]
International Case Study:
In Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation, the Federal Court of Australia rejected the taxpayer’s TP analysis, favoring a profit split approach to address intangibles.[8]
Lessons for Morocco:
5. Stimulating International Trade Through TP Policies
TP policies not only prevent abuse but also create a transparent environment that fosters trade and investment. For example, Morocco’s DTAs with countries like France and Spain include TP provisions that reduce withholding taxes, promoting cross-border financing and IP transfers. Consideration should be positioned toward the following steps:
The Ministry of Economy and Finance in Morocco expressed that “Transparent TP policies reduce trade barriers and encourage foreign direct investment in emerging markets.”[9]
6. Challenges in Applying TP Policies in Morocco and Africa
1. Limited Comparables and Benchmarking Issues
Africa’s economic landscape offers fewer uncontrolled transactions for benchmarking, forcing reliance on global comparables that may not reflect local realities.
Solution:
2. Valuation Complexities for Intangibles
Valuing IP and other intangibles is particularly challenging due to their unique and non-physical nature.
Solution:
3. Capacity Constraints
African tax administrations, including Morocco’s, often lack the expertise and resources to enforce TP regulations effectively.
Solution:
7. Proposed Solutions and Innovations
8. Conclusion
Applying transfer pricing policies in line with internationally recognized principles is vital for preventing double taxation and stimulating trade in Morocco and Africa. While challenges such as valuation complexities and resource constraints persist, solutions like regional collaboration, technology-driven compliance, and advanced pricing mechanisms can significantly enhance TP frameworks. By aligning with global best practices while addressing local needs, Morocco can strengthen its position as a leading investment destination in Africa.
OECD, Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations para. 1.1 (2022). ↑
OECD, Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital art. 9 (2017). ↑
Code Général des Impôts [CGI] art. 214 (2021) (Morocco). ↑
OECD, BEPS Action Plan Overview (2015). ↑
OECD, Transfer Pricing Guidelines para. 4.1 (2022). ↑
ATAF, Tax Policy Frameworks for Africa (2022). ↑
Tribunal Administratif de Rabat (First Instance), Decision n° 78/2022 (2022). ↑
Chevron Australia Holdings Pty Ltd v. Commissioner of Taxation, [2017] FCA 109. ↑
Ministry of Economy and Finance (Morocco), Annual Tax Policy Report (2023). ↑
ATAF, Technology in Tax Administration for Africa (2023). ↑